Hi Ryan,

I hope my question did not offend you. I didn't expect that the answer to
this question would be considered to be that obvious.

Best,
Manuel

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:57 AM R Smith <ryansmit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2019/05/13 12:56 AM, Manuel Rigger wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It seems that a table created in the temp database cannot have a parent
> > table that is created in the main database and vice versa:
> >
> > PRAGMA foreign_keys=true;
> > CREATE TABLE t0 (c0 PRIMARY KEY);
> > CREATE TEMP TABLE t1 (c0, FOREIGN KEY(c0) REFERENCES t0(c0));
> > INSERT INTO t1(c0) VALUES (1); -- no such table: temp.t0
> >
> > Is this intended? It somehow seems so, since the parent table can also
> not
> > be prefixed by "temp." when declaring the foreign key in the above
> example.
> > However, I did not find a note in the documentation that this is not
> > supported. Would it make sense to describe this in the limitations at
> > https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html?
>
>
> While the "why" of it has been handled by others, the question of "need
> it be documented" still remains, to which I can comment: Documenting the
> fact that FK relationships cannot be maintained across different
> database entities, trespasses on two documentation conventions:
>
> A - Do not document the obvious (i.e. no point documenting the fact that
> your car needs all 4 wheels for correct operation)[1], and
> B - Do not document the negative (i.e. Say what you CAN do [short list]
> rather than what you CAN'T [infinite list]) - unless it is an expected
> yet omitted behaviour (such as things that can normally be done in other
> databases, but not in this one)[2].
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ryan
>
>
> [1] - Rant: There seems to be a senseless move to document exactly such
> silliness for fear of litigation these days, making modern documentation
> more and more a self-indemnification checklist by the manufacturer
> rather than a helpful description of the operation and functionality of
> the item. It used to be that the number 1 source of information about
> the vehicle/device you purchased was its manual (written by Engineers),
> now it's more TLDR; (edited by PR/Legal people) and for real information
> you simply pray there is a youtube video on the issue by another
> enthusiast.
>
> [2] - I know MSSQL "allows" temp tables to have foreign keys specified,
> but it doesn't enforce the constraint, so it's nothing more than no-op
> syntactic sugar, perhaps in an effort to not have it choke on
> copy-pasted schemata.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to