Keith,
The final script produces corresponding results here, only a constant factor
slower (minimal CPU). The rows per second is useful to summarize the tests for
various keyset sizes. Below is the average per method with input parameter 5.
meth|rps|note
1|149431|Individual Row
2|195447|Individual Row (Sorted)
3|167740|Rows ExecuteMany
3|167740|Rows ExecuteMany Sorted
4|146503|Using IN temp
5|149261|Using IN temp (sorted)
6|137831|Using IN keyset
7|136984|Using IN keyset sorted
8|170922|Using IN (dynamic)
9|188759|Using IN (sorted)
A|242761|Using IN CArray
B|274883|Using IN CArray sorted
C|308547|Using Array JOIN sorted
Hope this is useful to the original poster.
To me SQLite-Python is almost addicting. I learned to use carray now. It
appears to interface brillantly with Python's array module. Only I have a
custom carray instead of a custom execute method as you APSW (replaced
sqlite3_bind_pointer by sqlite3_value_int64, for home use only).
Method C is a JOIN to carray, where the keys are sorted. Order by is not needed
then.
select x.* from carray(?,?,'int64') cross join x on id=value
Thanks, E. Pasma
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
