standalone seems reasonable. To confuse things further, I have seen Sqlite embedded in an embedded web server, serverless doesn't fit that case.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:45 AM Jose Isaias Cabrera <jic...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > Richard Hipp, on Monday, January 27, 2020 05:18 PM, wrote... > > > > For many years I have described SQLite as being "serverless", as a way > > to distinguish it from the more traditional client/server design of > > RDBMSes. "Serverless" seemed like the natural term to use, as it > > seems to mean "without a server". > > > > But more recently, "serverless" has become a popular buzz-word that > > means "managed by my hosting provider rather than by me." Many > > readers have internalized this new marketing-driven meaning for > > "serverless" and are hence confused when they see my claim that > > "SQLite is serverless". > > It's kinda funny. Back in 2006 I needed to create an app with SQL but on a > local machine. MySQL was too big for the simple app, so, I wanted something > without a server. So, I actually searched on "serverless SQL engine", and > BOOOM!, sqlite.org came up. Now you want to take that away from me. :-) > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
