Standalone (library / database provider ) native header-only (almost)
there's an entry on 'standalone programs' in wikipedia, and there's lots of other libraries that have standalone versions, but it's not a very well defined word. in-process is probably closest (in-process database (interface/provider)) does it need to be a single word? or maybe just a catchy acronym, SIS (standalone in-process service) [probably not that one....] On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:03 PM Peter da Silva <res...@gmail.com> wrote: > Server-free sounds good. Standalone too. Integrated maybe? > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 17:54 Donald Shepherd <donald.sheph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 10:19 am, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > > > daemon-less? > > > -- > > > D. Richard Hipp > > > d...@sqlite.org > > > > > > In-process? Same concept but defining it by what it is rather than what > it > > isn't. > > > > Regards, > > Donald Shepherd. > > > > > <d...@sqlite.org> > > _______________________________________________ > > sqlite-users mailing list > > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
