On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, ThomasChust wrote:
[...]
as the author of yet another SQLite3 binding for a manifestly typed language
(CHICKEN Scheme) I can only second the concerns expressed in other answers to
the original posting. I would expect the interface to get far more
complicated with strict typing in SQLite3. In fact, that SQLite3 is
manifestly typed was one of the main reasons for choosing it as a database
backend in my Scheme applications in the first place.
[...]
Hello,
maybe I sounded a little harsh in my last posting.
I didn't want to say the whole proposal is bad in itself. It certainly
sounds interesting and for some applications it will be just the right
thing to do. But I do think it would be a bad idea to incorporate all
those changes into the mainstream SQLite3 distribution and I don't know
whether the target audience of the proposal and of SQLite3 is identical.
cu,
Thomas
