I have no suggestions (I'm not an embedded systems guy), but your initial comment implied that there were other options. If there aren't then your original statement is invalid and there's nothing to discuss. :)
-T > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 8:27 AM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: RE: [sqlite] Concurrency > > Tom, > > > > I don't want to use > > > other database, because I think Sqlite is great for an > > > embedded system that I > > > am using. > > > > I think that your own questions about concurrency prove this > > incorrect. If you need high concurrency and you don't like retries, > > SQLite is not the database for you. > > Then what database would you suggest instead Sqlite for use > in embedded (low > memory, cpu: 200 Mhz) system? > ______________________________________________________________ > _____________ > Najhitrejši brezplačni klicni dostop :: Varno in zanesljivo > po internetu > Obiščite http://www.dialup386.com/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
