D. Richard Hipp The blog is updated!, and I think you should put in your website GoogleAds to get other benefis with your wonderful project, and the comunity think about this?
Thank you for take time for send me the update information. Also this information will be publish in some free magazines from here. Here it could be found: http://cesarodas.com/2007/06/how-to-manage-thousands-visitors-part-ii-wwwsqliteorg.html On 27/06/07, Cesar D. Rodas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you very much for your information Mr. Hipp! I will update my blog. On 26/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Cesar D. Rodas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was surfing and I saw that sqlite website is very busy with a hight > band > > width traffic (http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=sqlite.org > ) > > and I was reading about the SQLite has an Server which is not the > normal > > apache or other known webserver, is that right? > > > > I am interesting to know more about this server, and configurations > about > > know more about the SQLite server configuration, what do you do Mr. > Hipp for > > handle a great quantity of traffic (server configuration, your wserver > code > > (if you can give it away) and a network connection)? If you can give > that > > information will be great, coz I think is better the Practice (and > your site > > is very very busy) than theory. > > > > I was surfing and I found your article: > > http://cesarodas.com/2007/06/how-to-manage-thousands-visitors-part-ii-wwwsqliteorg.html > > Let me give you slightly more up-to-date statistics on the > www.sqlite.org website. Traffic has been on a steady rise > for some time now, and for the past week we've seen in excess > of 10000 unique IPs per day. The total number of hits is > still running around 70000/day. Bandwidth is over 3GB per > day. CPU utilization is running about 4%. (It is unclear to > me if that is 4% of the total CPU available on the physical > host or 4% of my 1/20th slice of that host. Probably the > former....) > > I made a change to the althttpd.c server a couple of months > ago where it automatically drops any connection from the msnbot > or IE5 running on windows95 (as determined by the USER-AGENT > parameter in the HTTP header.) Kicking off the msnbot resulted > in a huge reduction in hits but with no reduction in the number > of unique IPs. This means, of course, that SQLite is no longer > listed on the MSN search, but nobody seems to use MSN so that > is no big loss. And the MSN bot is downright abusive in the > way it hammers a site. The load presented by the msnbot far > exceeds the combined load of all other search engines on the > internet combined. Go figure.... > > I used to get lots of hung win95/IE5 clients that would do > things like download 50000 copies of the tarball over the > course of 8 hours. I would be getting 2 or 3 download > requests per second. This was chewing through a lot of > bandwidth so I just made the decision to ban win95/IE5 from > the site. So far, no complaints have reached me. > > Perhaps someday my humble little website will be overwhelmed > and I will have to switch to something like Apache which is > designed to handle a heavy load. But for now, everything > seems to be going along peachy. If it ain't broke, don't > fix it.... > > -- > D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Cesar D. Rodas http://www.cesarodas.com/ Mobile Phone: 595 961 974165 Phone: 595 21 645590 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Cesar D. Rodas http://www.cesarodas.com/ Mobile Phone: 595 961 974165 Phone: 595 21 645590 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
