--- Scott Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may mean that I'll need to branch fts2 to fts3 and deprecate
> fts1/2 as being not safe for use. If the code is going to have to
> create new tables and populate them, then there's not a lot of gain
> versus just having the developer do that.
Is it a good thing to still call the upgraded module "fts2" if
its schema is not backwards compatible with older versions of
sqlite/fts2? This is similar in spirit to the sqlite 3.x file
format change that was later reverted.
Just playing the devil's advocate - I don't use fts.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo!
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
