Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The segv seems to be resolved. At least no more issues > with this version of the code. >
That's funny, because I haven't changed anything to address your problem. I never could reproduce it. Perhaps you were using a version of the code that was two or three revs behind what I was using. There were many fixes to the multithreading logic earlier in the week. -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------