"Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> My general tendency is to assume that anytime I implement something in
> parallel to another implementation, no matter how trivially obviously
> identical the implementations are, at some point I'm going to pay a
> price (usually because something gets added to the original
> implementation and I don't realize I need to change my parallel
> implementation).  This may-or-may-not be an appropriate amount of
> paranoia for any particular project :-).
> 

Reasonable paranoia, in general, I think.  But the format of strings
in SQL is well defined, and so unless you are using a certain 
popular client/server database engine that is famous for breaking 
the rules, you are probably pretty safe coming up with your own 
string quoter.

--
D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to