Hi Daan,
You can make the columns (a, b) unique across (a, b), but not
separately unique; by that whenever you are trying to insert a row with
same (a, b) combination it will give an error and at that time you can
update the column values c and d. I hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
Phani
-----Original Message-----
From: Daan van der Sanden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:06 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: [sqlite] Re: Merge two rows/records
Thanks for the quick reply!
Simon Davies writes:
> > sqlite> select a,b,sum(c),sum(d) from foo group by a,b;
> >
> > gives you the data you are after. This could be used to populate
> > another table via
> >
> > sqlite> insert into newFoo select a,b,sum(c),sum(d) from foo group
by
> > a,b;
> >
> > Of course, if you can get the data you want from your existing table
> > using a simple query, you may not actually need a new table.
At the moment I've got a database with values gathered from multiple
inputs that generated "duplicate entries" for the "what should be
unique"
a,b combination. So I was wondering if they could be "easily" merged
without creating a new table.
Now I'm going to first copy all unique samples to a new database and
then
insert the summed values using the given query. But this solution seems
a
bit awkward, since I'm copying 6 million unique records to a new
database
and adding a small 22.000 records that are summed. So that's why I was
wondering if it could be done in the same table.
I hope my problem is a bit clearer now.
Kind regards
Daan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
