Yes choice is good, Either way I'm greatful for an Excellent Tool, I can workaround and Live without strict Affinity. But the option to enable it would be a welcome feature.
Would there be any performance implications of Strict Affinity, either positive or negative? Samuel Neff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But the important point is that no matter how much discussion we have, we will never all agree that untyped is better than typed or that typed is better than typed. That's why an option so individual developers can choose is good. We don't have to agree, with an option we can agree to disagree. Sam On Feb 7, 2008 11:46 PM, Roger Binns wrote: > > There are also a whole school of people who believe that dynamic typing > as used in SQLite is far more productive and results in less code. For > example the Python programming language is typed in a similar way. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing > > There are many sites with many discussion threads containing opinions, > anecdotes and evidence and code supporting all the positions on this > issue. Feel free to discuss the merits there. > > Roger > > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
