Why does the attached test case show the expected "cannot rollback -
no transaction is active" error with the v1 interface, but the
generic "SQL logic error or missing database" error when using the v2
interface?

If I add a sqlite3_reset to the v2 interface case (treating it like
v1), I get the expected error message.

(tested on 3.6.0)

-- 
Glenn Maynard
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to