On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:50:20PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Why does the attached test case show the expected "cannot rollback - > no transaction is active" error with the v1 interface, but the > generic "SQL logic error or missing database" error when using the v2 > interface? > > If I add a sqlite3_reset to the v2 interface case (treating it like > v1), I get the expected error message. > > (tested on 3.6.0)
I guess this is a bug, then... Easy enough to work around (reset the statement like the v1 API, which is usually a good thing to do anyway), just a pain to diagnose if you don't know about it. -- Glenn Maynard _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
