I just ran Dennis's test databases through the test application and we're getting similar results: 1k Pages (17.4 MB) used 18102 KB High 20416 KB 4k Pages (12.2 MB) used 18102 KB, High 26416 KB (not sure why the high is higher?) My test database however with the same test application produces the following: 1k Pages (7.46 MB) used 22735 KB, High 25138 KB.
So it looks my issue could be data related if my test database going through the same app is coming out so large, Dennis's database is expanding to about 101.6% of its original size but mine is expanding to 297.6% of its original size. This begs the question is the 3rd party tool (SQLite Analyzer) I'm using to import from an excel file causing this expansion with bad data type choices? And is there any other way to import table structure and contents from xls (or csv) to sqlite? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Cote Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 7:10 AM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] Reducing SQLite Memory footprint(!) Brown, Daniel wrote: > 2. And the other thing to try would be if anyone has a fairly meaty test > database they don't mind sharing that I could fling at my test > application to try and rule out the data? > Daniel, I can send you copies of the databases I am using for my testing, both the version with the 1K page size (17.4 MB) and the one with the 4K page size (12.2 MB). Where would you like me to send them? The zipped versions are each about 1.3 MB in size. Dennis Cote _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list email@example.com http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users