On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:14 AM, P Kishor wrote: > Actually, there can be one bad effect of Darren's suggestion, now that > I think of it, and that would be for those who don't care for strong > typing. They will end up getting strong typing for all non-UNIVERSAL > columns whether they like it or not, whether they expect it or not, > unless there is a pragma as well to just disable strong typing > completely.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: > Support for what I indicated could conceivably just be added like > how support > for foreign keys was just added, and it could be turned on/off with > a pragma > likewise to aid backwards compatibility, for people who wrote the > column types > in their SQL but expected enforcement to be lax. e _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
