On 11 Dec 2010, at 2:28pm, BareFeetWare wrote: > On 11/12/2010, at 12:58 PM, Petite Abeille wrote: > >> I'm in the opinion that a comprehensive data dictionary, accessible directly >> from SQL, is the way to go. > > Yes, yes, yes :-) > > I think there's an SQL standard for introspective queries, isn't there? Is it > something like MySQL's "INFORMATION_SCHEMA Tables", as per?: > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/information-schema.html
Section 21 of the (SQL92) standard. It's absolutely horrible. Let's try to avoid that if we can. Fortunately SQLite has no user model, so most of it would be pointless anyway. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
