On 21 Dec 2010, at 9:24am, Philip Graham Willoughby wrote: > My hunch is that if this were done the result would be
Point 1: > something no-one wants Point 2: > : not much smaller than Postgres/MySQL/etc, as complex to use as > Postgres/MySQL/etc (more so as most stuff you want to achieve with those can > be done with google and copy/paste), and probably significantly slower. Thanks for that, and the analysis that preceded it. That was my guess, especially point 1, the most significant thing. It's tough to find a decent extension for SQLite that enough people want. The two extensions I see most referred to are FTS3 (to provide the full-text search) and rtrees (to define distance in terms of two coordinates). Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
