2011/10/12 Petite Abeille <petite.abei...@gmail.com> > > In any case, you can easily refactor the query into two steps: > > (1) First get your pagination > (2) Then join to your fts > > I tried implementing your refactoring, but immediately run into a problem. The user must be able to sort the data on any of the columns returned. So 'ORDER BY table1.rowid DESC' is really a variabele, which could easily be 'ORDER BY table2.data2 DESC', in which cases the query fails, because .data2 is not selected in the inner query. And I cannot move 'ORDER BY' into the outer loop, because else it will only sort the 250 results returned, not the underlying data.
So the questions remains: why does increasing OFFSET kill performance when selecting table2.data2 in additation to the columns of table1. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
