On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> Think is, it's possible to do it right. It's just that doing it right > means every operation takes two or three times as long as the slightly buggy > implementations we have now. And people prefer fast-but-buggy. > A slight elaboration: Simone does not mean to imply that locking over networked filesystems is necessarily fast per se, but that "doing it right" would be slower than "fast but buggy." i once had a relatively simple app whose runtime increased 100x+ over NFS when locking was enabled, even though it only made a few lock/unlock calls. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
