On 3 Nov 2011, at 3:57pm, Paxdo Presse wrote: > Even if the requests are very fast, it seems risky not to use WAL?
As opposed to no journal ? Yes, using no journal at all is risky. But the older style rollback journal system was about as fast and as trustworthy as WAL journals. I see no reason not to use it as that's what SQLite defaults to using. If I start getting contention issues (locks failing because of too many concurrent attempts at access) then I'll look into using some PRAGMAs, possibly switching to WAL. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
