-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/11 11:32, Paxdo Presse wrote: > Roger, I meant: I feel that WAL is rarely used with its new > capabilities.
Outside almost 100 million Android devices? > SQLite + WAL may, perhaps, now compete with Mysql / postgres to handle > web apps with thousands of users. But what is its limit? Limit of what? The number of concurrent requests you can serve will be limited by hardware, operating system, and all the other code that runs in order to service a request. SQLite could be anywhere from 95% of the code run to service a request to 2%. You can of course find out exactly what happens in your exact setup by implementing a representative benchmark. There are plenty of testing tools (eg ab). > In this context, there is currently not a lot of feedback, I feel. > There are not enough people know about these new opportunities. I'm still very confused what exactly it is you want. Do you want some reassurance that SQLite will never give wrong answers? http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html Do you want reassurance it can handle any load thrown at it? The code is performant, but what can be handled will depend a lot more on the non-SQLite code. Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6y7UgACgkQmOOfHg372QTi7wCfdlTRXDdTUwfNZ9ndJfxKXGRg CMIAnj7X1GZXvLHMnyY6CO7K/jqkhjqp =kTgr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
