IntelliSence on/off doesn't solve the stepping problem. Maybe it's a MSVC 
problem. My pracmatic solution is take WinDbg. 
 
Jens

Am 29.12.2011 um 15:17 schrieb "Black, Michael (IS)" <michael.bla...@ngc.com>:

> What happens if you disable IntelliSense?
> 
> 
> 
> Tools/Options/Text Editor/C++/Advanced -- IntelliSense/Disable 
> IntelliSense=True
> 
> 
> 
> Michael D. Black
> 
> Senior Scientist
> 
> Advanced Analytics Directorate
> 
> Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
> 
> Northrop Grumman Information Systems
> 
> ________________________________
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on 
> behalf of Jens Frederich [jfreder...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:47 AM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] 3.7.9 amalgamation file in VS2005
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I duplicated your problem on C++ 2011 Professional. Source code stepping
> doesn't work.
> My solution is to remove all comment lines.
> 
> Jens
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Teg <t...@djii.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yeah,  I  was  wrong. Color syntax highlighting does work. It's single
>> stepping into the code that doesn't. Sorry.
>> 
>> C
>> 
>> 
>> Wednesday, December 28, 2011, 3:04:39 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> AN> Dear Michael,
>> AN>
>> AN> thanks for trying this out. Not at the moment but I will consider
>> upgrading for the future.
>> AN>
>> AN> In fact I was surprised about this problem because amalgamation
>> AN> file version 3.7.7.1 still *has* correct highlighting in both
>> AN> VS2005 and 2008. The 3.7.9 amalgamation fle is, of course, larger,
>> AN> but the difference does not seem to be so big so that the
>> AN> highlighting should fail. So maybe there might be some syntax
>> AN> elements in 3.7.9 (large comments or whatever) causing this
>> AN> behaviour or there is really a maximum source file size that
>> AN> VS2005 and 2008 syntax highlighter can support, which was reached
>> between 3.7.7.1 and 3.7.9.
>> AN>
>> AN> Thanks
>> AN>
>> AN> Alex
>> AN> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Od: "Black, Michael (IS)"
>>>> Komu: General Discussion of SQLite Database
>>>> Datum: 27.12.2011 23:36
>>>> Předmět: Re: [sqlite] 3.7.9 amalgamation file in VS2005
>>>> 
>> AN> I duplicated your problem on C++ 2005 Express and C++ 2008 Express.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> AN> C++ 2010 Express does the syntax highlighting correctly (or at least a
>> lot better).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> AN> Can you upgrade?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> AN> Michael D. Black
>> 
>> AN> Senior Scientist
>> 
>> AN> Advanced Analytics Directorate
>> 
>> AN> Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
>> 
>> AN> Northrop Grumman Information Systems
>> 
>> AN> ________________________________
>> AN> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
>> AN> [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on behalf of Alexandr Němec [
>> a.ne...@atlas.cz]
>> AN> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 8:55 AM
>> AN> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> AN> Subject: EXT :[sqlite] 3.7.9 amalgamation file in VS2005
>> 
>> 
>> AN> Dear all,
>> 
>> AN> I have one question that is not strictly a SQLite question
>> AN> (sorry), but maybe someone encountered this problem and found the
>> AN> solution. I have upgraded from an older SQLite release to 3.7.9
>> AN> and loaded the amalgamation file into a Visual Studio 2005
>> AN> project. But the syntax code highlighter does not behave correctly
>> AN> with the 3.7.9 amalgamation file because it greys out not only the
>> AN> sections of code that are not compiled at all (because of
>> AN> if(n)def's) but also other sections that DO compile. Well, I think
>> AN> that this is a bug of the VS 2005 syntax highlighter for such a
>> AN> large source file, because the file compiles ok, but working with
>> AN> such a file in VS 2005 is frustrating.
>> 
>> AN> Did anyone see (did anyone find a solution for) this problem? I
>> AN> have not seen this for older versions of the amalgamation file.
>> 
>> AN> Best regards
>> 
>> AN> Alex
>> AN> _______________________________________________
>> AN> sqlite-users mailing list
>> AN> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> AN> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>> AN> _______________________________________________
>> AN> sqlite-users mailing list
>> AN> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> AN> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Teg                            mailto:t...@djii.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to