On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Jay A. Kreibich <j...@kreibi.ch> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:37:04PM -0700, J Decker scratched on the wall: >> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: >> > On 2 Sep 2012, at 3:13am, shuif...@mail.ustc.edu.cn wrote: > >> >> 2??how many user connections the sqlite can handler >> > >> > There is no limit in SQLite for connections. >> >> It is not advised to have multiple processes connect to same file. .. >> but in-process probably no limit of connections. > > I'm not sure where this idea comes from, as it is perfectly > acceptable to have multiple processes accessing the same database > file. > > SQLite makes very little distinction between different connections > from the same process and different connections from different > processes, so there isn't any significant limit that applies to one > situation that doesn't apply to the other. > > Concurrency is always an issue, and you don't want hundreds of > connections banging on the same file, but that's true no matter if > the connections come from the same process or not. >
the point would be 'and not have concurrancy issues that I'd have to solve myself...' > -j > > -- > Jay A. Kreibich < J A Y @ K R E I B I.C H > > > "Intelligence is like underwear: it is important that you have it, > but showing it to the wrong people has the tendency to make them > feel uncomfortable." -- Angela Johnson > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
