There is/was additional documentation which stated multiple threads within the same process could open that same connection and share the cache. I'm not talking about program A sharing a memory database with Program B, but rather threads 32, 55, 126, and 84 of Program A being able to open and close on demand.
> On May 28, 2013 at 7:31 AM Kevin Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Roland Hughes > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > ":memory:" is a one-shot wonder. The example from the documentation > > allowed multiple threads to use the _same_ in memory database. > > > > > Am I not understanding the explanation on that page correctly? My > understanding would be that > > "file:memdb1?mode=memory&cache=shared" > > is aimed at a single process having access to two or more distinct but > shareable in-memory databases. > > "If two or more distinct but shareable in-memory databases are needed in a > single process, then the mode=memory > <http://www.sqlite.org/uri.html#coreqp>query parameter can be used > with a URI > filename <http://www.sqlite.org/uri.html> to create a named in-memory > database:" > -- > -- > -- > --Ô¿Ô-- > K e V i N > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users Roland Hughes, President Logikal Solutions (630)-205-1593 - cell http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com http://www.infiniteexposure.net _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
