Will without rowid introduce a new schema version number? If so, we’ll be ok since GeoPackage requires schema version 4.
Pepijn On 15 Nov 2013, at 16:33, Peter Aronson <pbaron...@att.net> wrote: > One additional thing not listed in this document -- use of a internal rowid > alias (OID, ROWID or _ROWID_) will produce a parse error on a query against a > WITHOUT ROWID table (unless, of course, it has an actual column with the > specified name), which makes sense, of course, but could be an issue for > generic table handling code that currently uses any of those. > > The fact that the presence of such a table makes a database containing one > unreadable at releases before 3.8.2 is a bit of an issue for those using > SQLite as a data exchange format (like GeoPackages), but then that's true > with partial indexes too. > > Peter > > On 11/15/2013 4:47 AM, Luís Simão wrote: >> SQLite answers those question in: >> >> http://www.sqlite.org/draft/withoutrowid.html >> >> BR >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
