If the field def'n were to be changed to [ col2 NUMBER DEFAULT ON NULL 0 ]
and then when I insert/update something that becomes NULL and the result
becomes 0 for that field, then yeah, bingo.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Petite Abeille <petite.abei...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 6:14 AM, Stephen Chrzanowski <pontia...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > When adding a NULL value to a table that has the NOT NULL flag set on
> that
> > field, instead of raising an exception, if the field definition were to
> > have the word "USE" between "ON CONFLICT" and "DEFAULT" in its
> declaration,
> > it'd use whatever the fields default value was set to.  If USE is
> included,
> > the DEFAULT value must be included, otherwise the table isn't created.
>
> Oh, wait… isn’t that what an other, unnamed database does? [1]
>
> E.g. DEFAULT ON NULL
>
> [1]
> http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/12c/default-values-for-table-columns-enhancements-12cr1.php#nulls
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to