Hi everyone, I am currently using > ATTACH DATABASE ? AS ?; to dynamically attach databases to a connection. In some cases, the same physical database file is attached under different names.
This all seems to work perfectly, although the documentation for the ATTACH statement specifies the name as type "database-name", not as "expr", so I'm not sure if specifying a bind parameter is "legal". So I'd like to know if this behaviour is intended and thus safe to rely on (and will it continue to be supported)? Same goes for attaching the same file multiple times (under different names). -- Kind regards, FJS
