Hello ! Again your proposition doesn't stand up !
There is no "waste of cpu cycles" for work that is not done, I mean for the ones that write queries for the machine instead to the humans, they will continue to have the same results (less parsing steps, besides the parsing normally accounts to something like 0.01% to 0.0001% or less of the time spent on the query). Cheers ! ? > Sat Sep 05 2015 8:34:00 pm CEST CEST from "R.Smith" <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> >Subject: Re: [sqlite] Third test of json and index expressions, now it works > > On 2015-09-05 08:07 PM, Darko Volaric wrote: > >>So my question remains: why not have this user friendly feature? What are >> the motivations for not having it? >> > Waste of CPU cycles punishing those users who stick to valid SQL for the > sins of those who like shortcuts. > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > ?
