Hello ! Sorry about that !
I confused your email with other person that was so negative and defensive about any critic to sqlite even constructive ones. I apologize again ! Cheers ! > Sat Sep 05 2015 10:19:55 pm CEST CEST from "R.Smith" <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> >Subject: Re: [sqlite] Third test of json and index expressions, now it works > > On 2015-09-05 08:58 PM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: > >>Hello ! >> >> Again your proposition doesn't stand up ! >> > Again? > That was my first post on the subject and it was in reply to Darko whom > asked for a specific reason, so I supplied one. (Which by the way isn't > to say I am 100% convinced by the reason either, but no less, it's a > valid reason). > > >>There is no "waste of cpu cycles" for work that is not done, I mean for the >> ones that write queries for the machine instead to the humans, they will >> continue to have the same results (less parsing steps, besides the parsing >> normally accounts to something like 0.01% to 0.0001% or less of the time >> spent on the query). >> > If using aliases as valid where/group clause substitutes involved a mere > extra line of parsing code, then your assertion might hold water - but I > posit that believing that is akin to believing the Earth is flat. > > > Cheers, > Ryan > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > ?
