Jens Alfke wrote:

On Oct 9, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Howard Chu <h...@symas.com> wrote:

As for code freshness, I've seen no compelling new features from 3.8.x onward 
that would improve performance so there's been no reason to update further.

Perhaps, but there’s important new functionality in newer versions, such as 
partial indexes and indexes on expressions.

If it’s a personal project for you, or a tech demo, then it’s understandable 
for you to drop it when it stops being interesting; but if this is something 
intended for other people to use, they’re going to want to see it supported 
going forward (the way SQLCipher is, for instance.) It would be nice to add a 
note to the readme saying something like “FYI, this is based on SQLite 3.7.17 
and there are no plans to sync with newer versions.”

As with any open source project, if users want to see something change, the onus is on them to initiate those changes. Nobody associated with an open source project is ever obligated to proactively implement anything. particularly things that no user has asked for yet. SQLightning has many satisfied users already and none of them have requested the features you mentioned.

As for myself, it works for me in my personal builds of Mozilla Seamonkey.

Lack of development activity on a project doesn't mean it's dead and disused - it just means the project has accomplished its goals and its users are content.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to