On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:37:42PM +0300, Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > > -- there must be at least a test; the more tests the better; > > ok, but tests can be provided from interested parties, too (after > becoming exited about the provided "development" function addition).
The real situation here is usually worse than that - I have hard time asking the developers to provide tests for their patches, even less for other's patches. > I think it is important to get new functionality into the actual > development version. It can be later removed if it cannot be stabelized. They tends to be forgotten if not debugged at once. > where is the SQLObject2 project located? http://sqlobject.org/2/ > and when is the planned release? I don't think it will be released any tome soon. It needs a lot of work, as far as I understand. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
