Oleg Broytmann wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:37:42PM +0300, Ilias Lazaridis wrote: >>> -- there must be at least a test; the more tests the better; >> ok, but tests can be provided from interested parties, too (after >> becoming exited about the provided "development" function addition). > > The real situation here is usually worse than that - I have hard time > asking the developers to provide tests for their patches, even less for > other's patches.
I see. Possibly the process of providing tests should be simplified. >> I think it is important to get new functionality into the actual >> development version. It can be later removed if it cannot be stabelized. > > They tends to be forgotten if not debugged at once. ??? not with an active user-base. >> where is the SQLObject2 project located? > > http://sqlobject.org/2/ > >> and when is the planned release? > > I don't think it will be released any tome soon. It needs a lot of work, > as far as I understand. I think I understand. Possibly it's time to rearrange the efforts subjecting SQLObject. . -- http://lazaridis.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
