> StringValidator is intended to pass strings back and forth as is. For
> recoding there is UnicodeCol and UnicodeValidator, but it only needs one
> encoding - dbEncoding.
>
Ok, I see that one.
On the other hand, I would be quite happy to go with StringCols instead of
UnicodeCols. Strings are easier to handle with our c++ python extensions
and then there are some restrictions to the UnicodeCols in sqlobject, too.
Looking at the UnicodeStringValidator, I guess that the validators' task is
not only to validate the incoming/outgoing values, but also to do the
needed conversions, right? In that case, my code in StringValidator
wouldn't be completely off place, would it?
Bernhard
___________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
Diese Mitteilung ist nur fuer die Empfaengerin / den Empfaenger bestimmt.
Fuer den Fall, dass sie von nichtberechtigten Personen empfangen wird,
bitten wir diese hoeflich, die Mitteilung an die ZKB zurueckzusenden und
anschliessend die Mitteilung mit allen Anhaengen sowie allfaellige Kopien
zu vernichten bzw. zu loeschen. Der Gebrauch der Information ist verboten.
This message is intended only for the named recipient and may contain
confidential or privileged information.
If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by return e-mail
and delete this message and any attachments. Any unauthorised use or
dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
