On 10/3/07, Markus Gritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/3/07, David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was thinking that it might make more sense to just remove that whole
> > section.  I understand that whoever wrote that code thought it was
> > necessary to convert to Unicode, but I think it is not.  Can you comment
> > on this idea?
>
> There was a thread on this list containing an example which breaks
> without the conversion and runs fine with it.

http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02607.html

Markus

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss

Reply via email to