On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:57 +0200, Markus Gritsch wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Markus Gritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/3/07, David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was thinking that it might make more sense to just remove that whole
> > > section.  I understand that whoever wrote that code thought it was
> > > necessary to convert to Unicode, but I think it is not.  Can you comment
> > > on this idea?
> >
> > There was a thread on this list containing an example which breaks
> > without the conversion and runs fine with it.
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02607.html

This appears to be an example which breaks when you convert a unicode
string to unicode.  I was proposing removing the conversion altogether,
which would avoid the problem you mentioned in the first message.  If I
do this, your test still passes.  


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss

Reply via email to