On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:18:47PM -0500, j...@qlf.com wrote:
> Can the list be setup so that the default reply goes to the list instead of 
> your personal address?

   It is possible but I am not sure it is desirable. There are two opposite
ways of thinking about it:

   http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
   http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html

   Most Python-related lists I know are setup without Reply-To.

   I personally on the "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful" side, but I
must say I use a mail user agent (mutt) that has all 3 commands - reply,
reply to all, reply to the list. Also mutt allows to ignore Reply-To from
mailing lists, so I don't care too much.

   What do people think? If most people say they want Reply-To I can
change the list options.

Oleg.
-- 
     Oleg Broytman            http://phd.pp.ru/            p...@phd.pp.ru
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss

Reply via email to