On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 07:40:27PM +0200, Markus Elfring
<markus.elfr...@web.de> wrote:
> > Really? Why?
>
> The application of the SQLObject software (including a base class with this
> name)
> grew during the years and it has got the potential for further growth.
IWBN.
> > You better start coding refactoring your design when needed.
>
> My preferences for software development methodologies can occasionally be
> different from yours.
Hard to say. Until now I only saw one small commit from you and even
that was buggy initially.
> I am curious if such communication means will really help here
> when it seems that more fundamental change reluctance can be involved.
What are those planned fundamental change? Are you going to
restructure the entire SQLObject?
> How much explanation would you need for standard presentation functionality?
Not much. I'm sure I know the basics of UML. The most important thing
I know about UML is that it's seldom needed. But if you create some
diagrams that could be included as docs I'd be interesting to see.
> Regards,
> Markus
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytman https://phdru.name/ p...@phdru.name
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
