> What are those planned fundamental change? I would eventually try to derive another class with a few additional ingredients.
> Are you going to restructure the entire SQLObject? Not directly. - I am unsure if my proposal can trigger more collateral evolution in related software components. >> How much explanation would you need for standard presentation functionality? > > Not much. I'm sure I know the basics of UML. This is good to know. > The most important thing I know about UML is that it's seldom needed. The usage popularity can vary over time. > But if you create some diagrams that could be included as docs > I'd be interesting to see. I imagine that a status analysis can help also here. How are the chances to publish class collaboration diagrams? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
