[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13152220#comment-13152220
]
[email protected] commented on SQOOP-393:
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2874/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated 2011-11-17 18:47:44.428152)
Review request for Sqoop and Arvind Prabhakar.
Changes
-------
Fixed checkstyle violations.
Summary
-------
I've moved the functionality like we did with other classes.
This addresses bug SQOOP-393.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-393
Diffs (updated)
-----
/src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/SqoopOptions.java 1201319
/src/java/org/apache/sqoop/SqoopOptions.java 1201319
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2874/diff
Testing
-------
I've passed basic tests.
Thanks,
Jarek
> Class SqoopOptions was not properly moved
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-393
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0-incubating
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>
> Currently SqoopOptions classes in both namespaces (com.cloudera.sqoop and
> org.apache.sqoop) have the same implementation (looks like file copy with
> just few changes). We did not moved the functionality to org.apache.sqoop and
> set up inheritance to com.cloudera.sqoop namespace as we did with other
> classes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
