MainSqueeze wrote: > True. Luckily, I don't have any classical music that's mastered like > that. The Schoenberg "track" that I referred to in my earlier post, for > example, has an RG peak -- if that's the word -- of 0.039185, which > without RG is very unlikely to clip. (I quite like the idea of asking > 'Iggy Pop to remaster' > (https://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/08/musings-increasing-dynamic-range-of.html) > Schoenberg and Webern, though. Anton, Anton, I can tell / Your pretty > face is going to hell...) > > > > I don't use Foobar myself, so I really don't know, I'm afraid. That > might be a question for 'hydrogenaudio' > (https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?board=28.0), where I think much of the > discussion around Foobar takes place.I looked up replaygain clipping > prevention on the Foobar forums and didn't really find anything useful. I would expect if the clipping prevention was turned on and the peak was 1.0 then the Album gain would be reduced to 0.0. In practical terms it doesn't really matter if clipping prevention in Foobar works or not as LMS takes care of clipping prevention. A lot of albums where I see positive Album gains are live recordings where the audience reaction in between tracks can be louder than the music.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=112866 _______________________________________________ Squeezecenter mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
