Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hi Amos, Could you check and add the following patch please
? They should improve performance on high load systems by reducing disk
access
The patch does the following: [...]
Content analysis details: (7.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available.
0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=gcwsd-squid-dev%40m.gmane.org;ip=81.174.172.105;r=master.squid-cache.org]
0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
domains are different
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES No description available.
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
3.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT To: misformatted and supposed Microsoft tool
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Amos,
Could you check and add the following patch please ? They should improve
performance on high load systems by reducing disk access
The patch does the following:
1) Checks for MEMORY: keytab support and reads the keytab from disk into
MEMORY to improve performance (i.e. read keytab only at startup and nerver
again)
2) Add option for replay cache type. Allows to set replay cache to none
to improve performance ( may reduce security a bit )
3) Add option for replay cache directory. If /var/tmp is not the best
location you can choose a different location.
Thank you
Markus
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
squid-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
