It helps if I add the patch ;-) Markus
"Markus Moeller" wrote in message news:[email protected]... Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.Content preview: Hi Amos, Could you check and add the following patch please ? They should improve performance on high load systems by reducing disk access
The patch does the following: [...] Content analysis details: (7.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE No description available. 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)[SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=gcwsd-squid-dev%40m.gmane.org;ip=81.174.172.105;r=master.squid-cache.org]
0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
domains are different
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES No description available.1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
3.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT To: misformatted and supposed Microsoft tool _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected]http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
trunk_kerberos_memory_keytab.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
