Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
In accelerators the situation is more dim as the RFC does not apply to
accelerators, only your own definitions of what the accelerator should
do... It is perfectly fine (RFC wise) for an accelerator to substitute
it's own HTTP headers to any level desired.
How bad would it be to just drop the data header in this case? The RFC seems to allow for this.
This is why I ask, see:
http://www.ircache.net/cgi-bin/cacheability.py?query=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F&descend=on
(i.a.cnn.net and i.cnn.net are Squid)
-- Brian Akins Senior Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies
