On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Guido Serassio wrote: > I agree, but I think that things now are worse than October: > > The Adrian work is an effective fork of the Squid project, and I > think that a fork is a very dangerous option for the life of the > Squid project itself. > > Today we should think again about a 2.6 release, before a disaster. > So I propose a new poll about this: for me now this is a survival > question for the Squid Project that we know.
Continuing work on the Squid-2.6 codebase would make me - and a lot of others - very happy. I don't want to abandon squid-3 and the project but the powers that be don't want us to go anywhere near squid-3. So I'm stuck: do I work on squid-2.5 and spend all my time maintaining a local distribution consisting of lots-of-sourceforge-patches and a couple of local patches, or do we just throw in the towel and buy a Cisco Cache Engine? Adrian
