* Henrik Nordstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > tis 2007-03-20 klockan 19:40 +0100 skrev Thomas-Martin Seck: > > > Ack! Please address this, either by fixing the bugs or if this is not > > possible for whatever reason by telling users about them. I'll stick a > > big red warning sign to the port, too if needed. > > The main problem in fixing these is that there is no developers actively > working on the Squid-2 ICAP patch, just barely enough to maintain it. > Additionally the approach taken by the patch in how to hook in the data > flows is considered a bit of a dead end not encouraging it to be > actively developed much further..
Hm, sorry to hear that. I'll see whether I can integrate prominent warnings into the port. It's a pity that I cannot fix even obvious issues myself because I am not at all familiar with the Squid codebase and besides you are probably not really inclined to fix any bugs I add all by myself... > We would all love to see a stable and fully ICAP capable Squid. And at > the moment Squid-3 is the most promising for this I think. Since I received some requests for a Squid 3 port from users, I'll guess I start tracking Squid 3 with PRE6. PRE5 plus a bunch of changesets would be doable but I would rather wait for PRE6 if it's due to be put out soon.