On Mon, May 21, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote: > You have not mentioned any bugs that this change fixes. From the > discussion on this list, it looks like the change is far from trivial > and is more complex than you originally thought. UDP logging, the > primary factor for doing this changes (as far as I can guess), is not a > part of the proposed commit.
Thats because it doesn't. Well, it doesn't besides fixing "buffered_logs" to work with access.log and other logs as well as the debug.log. > Why do we need this feature in Squid 3.0? Can this wait until 3.0 is > branched out? The primary factor for doing this change is to implement an external logging helper process to get around blocking IO in a portable fashion (a la s26_logfile_daemon work on Sourceforge) but I didn't want to implement that until this was committed and 3.0 was branched. It can wait until 3.0 is branched. Adrian
