On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > The file re-arranging polish: > - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only > alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a > file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
Can you clarify the above? I am not disagreeing, but am not sure whether you are saying we should move/rename files in 3.1. > - If you think you can get it done in a reasonable timespan to get > done by the RC releases great. I don't think the PRE need to wait for > it, its polish after all not a true feature. > - It is your baby though. Understood. > If you have the resources to move a few 2.6 features to 3.1 they should > be timelined by 31 March or officially shifted to 3.2 pending later > re-evaluation. Yes? Agreed. I am still evaluating what needs to be ported and whether the Factory can sponsor any of that. Thank you, Alex.
