On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> The file re-arranging polish:
>   - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only 
> alteration.  3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a 
> file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.

Can you clarify the above? I am not disagreeing, but am not sure whether
you are saying we should move/rename files in 3.1.

>   - If you think you can get it done in a reasonable timespan to get 
> done by the RC releases great. I don't think the PRE need to wait for 
> it, its polish after all not a true feature.
>   - It is your baby though.


> If you have the resources to move a few 2.6 features to 3.1 they should 
> be timelined by 31 March or officially shifted to 3.2 pending later 
> re-evaluation. Yes?

Agreed. I am still evaluating what needs to be ported and whether the
Factory can sponsor any of that.

Thank you,


Reply via email to