mån 2008-04-07 klockan 16:01 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd: > I'm trying to avoid doing the much simpler solution and ignoring the rest - > ie, just having a local buffer, reading the reply from the server-side into it > until we have all the headers, and then just copying the first 4k out. > Thats a possible stopgap, especially for Squid-2.7, but I don't want that > lingering in the codebase.
That's fine. Running a test on 2.7 now to see how it actually behaves in the situation.. and it's fine. With the object in-memory is serves a cache hit, and with the object on disk we get a "swapin failure" and fallback on cache miss. Fully acceptable and not a regression (2.6 does the same thing, but in addition fails to forward the header proper as already mentioned). Regards Henrik
