On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Running a test on 2.7 now to see how it actually behaves in the > situation.. and it's fine. With the object in-memory is serves a cache > hit, and with the object on disk we get a "swapin failure" and fallback > on cache miss. Fully acceptable and not a regression (2.6 does the same > thing, but in addition fails to forward the header proper as already > mentioned).
You've tested 2.6 too? I read the code as handling a HIT but just not parsing the reply and sending it back verbatim. Adrian -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
